It is not permissible for one who is in a state of impurity to touch the Qur'an, whether that impurity is major or minor, because of what is mentioned in the letter of Amr ibn Hazm that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) sent to the people of Yemen, in which it says: No one should touch the Qur'an but one who is in a state of purity. Narrated by Maalik, 468; Ibn Hibbaan, 793; al-Bayhaqi, 1/87
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said: This hadeeth about the letter mentioned was classed as saheeh by a number of leading scholars, not in terms of the isnaad, but in terms of being very well known. Ash-Shaafai said in ar-Risaalah: They did not accept this hadeeth until it was proven to them that it was the letter of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
Ibn Abd al-Barr said: This letter is well-known to scholars of the Prophet's biography (seerah), and its contents are well known to the scholars. It is so well known that there is no need for an isnaad, because it is akin to tawaatur (the process by which a hadeeth or report was narrated from so many by so many that it is inconceivable that they could all have agreed upon a lie), so it was accepted by the scholars.
End quote from at-Talkhees al-Habeer, 4/17
This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani in Irwa' al-Ghaleel, 1/158
The kaafir (disbeliever) combines both kinds of impurity: if he becomes junub (impure following sexual activity), he does not do ghusl, and even if he did do ghusl, it would not be valid. Hence the majority of fuqaha' are of the view that the kaafir should not be allowed to touch the Mushaf.
It says in al-Mawsooah al-Fiqhiyyah, 38/19:
Kaafir touching the Mushaf or working in the copying out or production of Mushafs:
The kaafir should be prevented from touching the Mushaf, just as a Muslim who is in a state of janaabah should be prevented from touching it. In fact it is more important that the kaafir be prevented from touching it at all, whether he does ghusl or not. In al-Fataawa al-Hindiyyah it says that Abu Haneefah said: If he does ghusl, it is permissible for him to touch it. And it was narrated in al-Bahr from Abu Haneefah and Abu Yoosuf that he should be prevented in all cases, and the kaafir should be prevented from working in the production of Mushafs. Similar to that is what al-Qalyoobi said: The kaafir should not be allowed to bind the Mushaf or apply gold colour to the cover... End quote.
See also 37/282
The majority of fuqaha' are of the view that the kaafir should be prevented from touching the Mushaf, because the kaafir is najis (impure), so the Mushaf should be kept away from his touch.
Muhammad, one of the companions of Abu Haneefah, held a different opinion. He said: There is nothing wrong with him (the kaafir) touching the Mushaf if he has done ghusl, because the factor that is preventing him from doing that is physical impurity (hadath), which is removed by doing ghusl; rather what remains is the spiritual impurity of his belief, but that is in his heart, not in his hand. End quote.
See also the answer to questions no. 100228 and 96646
It is permissible for a kaafir and one who is in a state of minor impurity to touch a tafseer (commentary), a translation of the meanings of the Qur'an, or a book that contains the Qur'anic text, translation and commentary.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said: With regard to the translation of the meanings of the Qur'an, there is nothing wrong with a kaafir touching it, because what is meant by a translation is that it is a book of tafseer and is not Qur'an. In other words, the translation is a commentary on the meanings of the Qur'an, so if a kaafir or one who is not in a state of purity touches it, there is nothing wrong with that, because it does not come under the rulings on Qur'an. The rulings on Qur'an only apply to that which is written in Arabic only and in which there is no commentary. But if there is a translation with it, it comes under the ruling on tafseer (commentary), and it is permissible for a person who is in a state of minor impurity or a kaafir to carry it, because it is not a book of Qur'an; rather it is regarded as a book of tafseer.
End quote from Fataawa ash-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 24/340
See also the answer to question no. 10694
Based on that, it is possible to be gentle and polite in preventing the kaafir from touching the Mushaf by hastening to ask him, Do you have wudoo'? That is so as to inform him that the Mushaf can only be touched by one who has wudoo'. If you yourself do not have wudoo', and you pick up the Mushaf with a piece of cloth, or you put on gloves, for example, to open it and turn its pages, this will be something good that will demonstrate the sanctity of the Qur'an and will dispel any doubt from the Christian's mind, because we prevent a Muslim who does not have wudoo' from touching the Mushaf just as we also prevent the non-Muslim from doing so.
If he wants to buy it, you can pick up the Mushaf and show it to him, and give him something to put on his hand if he wants to look at it himself, then you can wrap it for him in a wrapper that is suitable for giving.
It is permissible to give him in the first place a Mushaf that has a commentary in the margins, or a translation of the meanings; in this case it is not required to be in a state of purity in order to touch it, as stated above.
You should also try to wrap it for him, so long as you know that he wants to buy it to give as a gift, to prevent him from touching it.
And Allah knows best.
Reproduced from Islam QA