By Dr. Spahic Omer
In Islam, believers, worship as a lifestyle, and the notion of the mosque as a community center, are inseparable. They originate from each other, needing one another for their proper functioning and continued existence. The mosque is as old as man on the earth, because the truth (Islam) is also as old. The first man and at the same time prophet, Adam, built the first mosques on the earth. The first mosques built were the al-Masjid al-Haram in Makkah and the al-Masjid al-Aqsa in Jerusalem. The interlude separating the two ancient mosques was forty years.
The life of a believer cannot be imagined without the mosque institution which as a community center should always occupy as much as possible the central and most strategic locations in villages, neighborhoods, towns and cities. The mosque should always contain as many meaningful and useful components and facilities as possible so as to function as a vibrant and effective community center. Good mosques are accessible, pleasant and convivial. They are cost-effective, environment friendly and sustainable. They provide a wide range of activities, benefits and services to their users so that they become resourceful, relevant, lively, valuable and alluring to both men and women, the young and old, the rich and poor, the busy and idle, and to the exemplary and average Muslims. Mosques are to be their people’s assets, not liabilities. Not just physically is a believer attached to the mosque, but also spiritually and mentally in his thoughts and cravings. Indeed, a true believer’s heart always yearns for the mosque. He feels most tranquil and contented inside the mosque. When he leaves it, his heart is attached to it until he returns to it. Mosques are the houses of Allah (buyut Allah). They are Islam manifested. They thus must be perceived, created and utilized only as such.
Those and other similar truths are to be remembered and painstakingly observed during the processes of planning, designing and building mosques. Mosques are to be living realities; to be living Islam. They cannot afford to become an elitist concept. They cannot afford to become mere landmarks, touristic attractions, the false symbols of a false power, and virtually dead monuments. Mosque architecture, first and foremost, should remain associated with the multidimensional world of functionality. It must not deviate from its authentic character and stray into the world of excessive invention and abstraction. Mosque architecture must not become a plaything in the hands of some misguided benefactors, architects or artists. If truth be told, when Muslims lose their spiritual and emotional connection to their mosques, virtually all authentic mosque art and architecture then end. The mosque is a microcosm of Islam and every true believer’s being.
When Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) migrated from Makkah to Madinah, the first and immediate task relating to the community building task and process which he embarked on fulfilling was building the city’s principal mosque, also called the Prophet’s mosque. Every other undertaking, including building houses for the migrants a majority of whom were poor and practically homeless, had to be deferred till after the Prophet’s mosques was completed. When completed, the form of the Prophet’s mosque was extremely simple. Its unpretentious form notwithstanding, the mosque from the first day served as a real community centre quickly evolving into a multifunctional complex. It was meant not only for performing prayers at formally appointed times, but also for many other religious, social, political and administrative functions. The main roles and functions performed by the mosque revolved around being a centre for congregational worship practices, a learning centre, the seat of the Prophet’s government, a welfare and charity centre, a detention and rehabilitation centre, a place for medical treatment and nursing, and a place for some leisure activities. The Prophet’s mosque was the nerve-centre of the wide spectrum of the activities and aspirations of the fast-emerging Muslim Ummah. The impact of the mosque complex on the development of Madinah was such that the core of the city eventually grew to be almost ring-shaped, centring on the complex. Thus, the standard was set for every future Muslim city in terms of the role of its principal mosque(s), as well as its position vis-à-vis the rest of the city’s spatial components.
After the Prophet’s death, the mosque institution continued to grow rapidly, proportionately to the rapid expansion of the Islamic state and its challenges: geographically, demographically, economically and culturally. As a result, the original roles and functions of the mosque became institutions on their own, rendering the mosque a multi-institutional complex. Subsequently, there came about an institutional decentralization whereby some institutions which originated, grew and matured under the auspices of the mosque had to separate themselves from it. The main reasons for this institutional decentralization were: rapid urbanization and development in Islamic cities, the emergence of the madrasah phenomenon, Sufism as well as the political and religious schism. However, barring some atypical and rare cases and circumstances, the mosque institution and the other independent institutions supported and collaborated with each other towards the common goals. They were allies towards a mutual good, rather than adversaries conspiring against each other, or attempting to outdo each other in the process of attaining their respective and particularized goals. There existed the highest level of institutional ideological harmony, rather than dichotomy, between the mosque institution and the rest of social institutions and establishments.
In this new phase of the mosque’s existence, which was marked by a partial institutional decentralization, there occurred, by and large, three patterns in the mosque’s relationships with the newly modeled social, political, educational and religious institutions. Firstly: the main mosque (jami’) stood alone, or with a few institutions attached to it, or standing nearby, while other institutions were separated and scattered individually throughout a city. Secondly: the main mosque (jami’) stood alone, or with a few institutions attached to it, or standing nearby, while some other institutions clustered around each other away from the mosque, thus forming new separate community centers or thrusts. Thirdly: the main mosques at the midpoints in cities were surrounded by a majority of social and educational institutions, thus forming huge, vast and bustling city centers containing the largest part of the cities’ institutions which were dominated by principal mosques. Although several institutions in the third pattern of the mosque’s relationship with the other institutions managed to branch out from the main jami’ mosques, that, however, was due to expediency rather than guiding principles.
Certainly, moreover, the phenomenon of the rift between the scholars (ulama’) and the rulers (hukkam), and the emergence of funerary institutions which was nourished and buoyed up both by the people’s spiritual laxity and the political conflicts and divisions, have left arguably the most undeletable and downbeat stain on the development of the mosque institution as a community centre.
Today as part of a holistic Islamization scheme, reviving the idea of the mosque as a community centre is crucial. The concept of the mosque complex functioning as a central focus of Muslims’ lives, in both physical and spiritual terms, ought to feature notably in the educational contents of Muslims at all levels. Not to be just a target, however, the mosque is to play an active and leading role in galvanizing such an educational outlook too. It is to be turned into a dynamic and visionary educational centre itself.
The mosque has to function as a community centre, as it was always meant to be, subject to the extent of the people’s needs and capacities. As many as possible of the numerous religious, social, educational and welfare roles and functions should be placed under the jurisdiction of the mosque and its annexes. Many other functions and roles will inevitably be shared by other social institutions, some more and others less. Along with those other social institutions and establishments, the mosque is thus to lead the way in transforming and revitalizing Muslim societies. The mosque will spearhead an institutional coalition representing all the segments and strata of society. It follows that neither the mosque institution on its own, nor the other social institutions in isolation from the mosque, are capable of reviving the fortunes of Muslims and the Islamic society.
The mosque and other institutions must work together towards the common good of Muslims. They are not to adopt and promote an ideological or conceptual dichotomy among themselves. They are to share almost the same philosophy, vision and mission, whereas their respective delivery systems and operational strategies will have to vary. They are not to be at odds with each other, one trying to undermine or destroy the other. They are not to conspire against, and try to outshine, each other either. Surely, this same relationship pattern must be adopted and followed by the two most influential parties in society: the scholars (ulama’) and the rulers (hukkam), who, essentially, are in charge of virtually all the institutions, bodies and establishments in society. Anything but that scenario will spell weakness and disaster for all. In addition, mosques must be empowered to become the detectors and annihilators of all religious and cultural deviational beliefs, traditions and innovations. The whole society, driven and guided by the power and charisma of the mosque institution, must resolutely confront those tendencies and their protagonists which show signs of being inclined to instituting, practicing and promoting such repulsive beliefs and customs. Everything in the Islamic society, be it within the ambit of the mosque or beyond, is subjected to the mosque’s authority – i.e., to the authority that it typifies, which is the authority of Islam. From the mosque, they all originate, one way or another, and to it they return for the validation and endorsement of their identities, ethos and practices. Surely, the God of the mosque is the God of everything else. Muslims cannot worship Allah in the mosque, but outside it they worship or glorify some other gods, deities or idols. Similarly, Muslims cannot propagate and hold supreme the worldview, principles and values of Islam in the mosque, but outside it they advocate and hold supreme other sets of worldviews, principles and values. Muslims cannot be believers and servants of Allah in their mosques, but outside them they are, for example, secularists in politics, materialists and self-aggrandizers in commerce, hedonists in leisure and entertainment, fraudsters and fibbers in mass media, extreme careerism seekers in education, and individualists and narcissists at home. In Islam, life in its totality is to be seen as worship and the whole earth as a mosque. In all his terrestrial pursuits a Muslim is to view his self as no more than a servant of his Creator and Lord, Allah.
If the mosque does not function as a community center, and worse yet, if the mosque institution is entangled in an institutional ideological confrontation with other institutions, the power and will of the people at the end will become diminished and their focus diffused. Life struggles will lose their transcendental ontological sense and meaning, becoming sheer mundane and inconsequential routines. The people, especially children and the young, will get perplexed as to which ideological preference to subscribe to and support: that of the mosque or that (those) of the other institutions. As a likely, yet impossible and futile, course of action, many persons will try to merge the elements of the existing ideological dichotomy or conflict between the mosque institution (Islam) and the other ideologies and worldviews. Dangerous as it is, however, such a feat will only increase the people in spiritual and mental confusion and disturbance, which, in turn, may lead to some serious doubting, anxiety and outright denial and rejection, as the truth and falsehood, and the light and darkness, cannot be reconciled or merged.
An indication of the ideal relationship between the mosque and its ideals, and between the other worldly concerns which are embodied in other social institutions, is given in the following Qur’anic verse: “Say: If your fathers and your sons and your brethren and your mates and your kinsfolk and property which you have acquired, and the slackness of trade which you fear and dwellings which you like, are dearer to you than Allah and His Messenger and striving in His way, then wait till Allah brings about His command: and Allah does not guide the transgressing people.” (al-Tawbah, 24)
All the institutions, establishments and bodies in the Islamic society must cooperate in the spirit of the following Allah’s words: “…And help one another in goodness and piety, and do not help one another in sin and aggression; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah; surely Allah is severe in requiting (evil).” (al-Ma’idah, 2)
Along the same lines, the Prophet (pbuh) is reported to have said: “The similitude of believers in regard to mutual love, affection, fellow-feeling is that of one body; when any limb of it aches, the whole body aches, because of sleeplessness and fever.”
He also said: “A believer to another believer is like a building whose different parts enforce each other.” The Prophet (pbuh) then clasped his hands with the fingers interlaced (while saying that).
 Muslim, Sahih Muslim, Book 032, Hadith No. 6258.
 Al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, Book 43, Hadith No. 626.